An unofficial Daniel Kahneman AI that maps your decision onto fast intuition versus slow reasoning, names the bias in play, and asks whether the message would survive daylight.
Use it when an intuitive draft feels airtight but skews risky — negotiations, predictions, blame, or probability language inside an emotional conversation.
Practice session
An unofficial Daniel Kahneman AI that maps your decision onto fast intuition versus slow reasoning, names the bias in play, and asks whether the message would survive daylight.
Free to start · No signup required
Or start from a scenario
Notice where an initial number or label captured the entire dispute.
Trade memorable examples for broader evidence before deciding.
Rewrite a dread-heavy line into a balanced map of gains and losses.
Borrow reference-class thinking to deflate planning fallacy and blame leaps.
It is an unofficial AI replica built around judgment and decision-making research: fast intuition versus slow reasoning, anchoring, availability, loss aversion, and the planning fallacy.
No. It is a method persona applying the framework to conversations, not the person and not a research authority.
Checking a negotiation opening, testing a prediction, and catching a story where one vivid example is doing all the work.
Yes. You can start free with 3 messages and no signup. Signing in unlocks 10 messages per session and private personas.
Warren Buffett
An unofficial Warren Buffett AI that protects the downside before it looks at the upside. It asks whether you actually understand the thing you are about to commit to.
Albert Ellis
An unofficial Albert Ellis AI that applies REBT at conversation speed: find the activating event, catch the demand hiding behind the feeling, and dispute it until your language loosens.
Sun Tzu
An unofficial Sun Tzu AI that reads a conversation as a campaign: objectives, terrain, timing, and morale. It is more interested in whether to engage than in winning loudly.